When companies talk about implementing KSeF, the discussion often focuses on technology: APIs, ERP integrations, XML schemas and system availability.

This is a mistake. While KSeF certainly requires technical integration, its real impact is on business processes.


KSeF changes how invoices are issued

Under KSeF, an invoice legally exists only once it is accepted by the system and assigned a KSeF ID.

  • when revenue is formally recognized
  • how sales and accounting teams coordinate
  • how exceptions and errors are handled

These are process questions — not technical ones.

Multiple departments are involved

KSeF affects far more than the IT department:

  • Sales defines when invoices are created
  • Accounting validates postings
  • Tax ensures VAT compliance
  • Finance depends on timely invoicing for cash flow
  • External accountants often participate in the process

Without clear ownership and alignment, even the best technical solution will struggle.

Error handling becomes a business responsibility

In KSeF, rejected invoices are legally considered as not issued. Companies must define:

  • who monitors rejections
  • who corrects errors
  • how quickly invoices are reissued
  • how customers are informed

Offline and exception scenarios require planning

KSeF introduces new operational scenarios such as:

  • offline invoicing during outages
  • emergency modes announced by the tax authority
  • delayed invoice transmission

Handling these cases requires clear internal procedures — not just code.

Governance and accountability are key

Successful KSeF implementations typically include:

  • a clearly appointed process owner
  • documented invoicing procedures
  • defined controls and escalation paths
  • training for all involved teams

Technology enables compliance, but process governance makes it sustainable.

👉 Before writing code:

Map your invoicing processes and define clear ownership across departments to ensure a smooth and sustainable KSeF implementation.